The Compassion Gap
Systems designed around visible, physical disability punish the kind they weren't built for — with discipline and exclusion.
A research series by Mark Friese
This is a series about systems that don't work. Not because they're under-resourced or badly managed — though they often are — but because the assumptions built into their design produce predictable harm for neurodivergent and disabled people.
The harm isn't a failure of the system. It's an output.
The Loop
Each stage follows from the one before. The final stage does not correct the first. There is no exit.
Systems designed around visible, physical disability punish the kind they weren't built for — with discipline and exclusion.
Survival strategies developed to navigate hostile systems become evidence you don't need support. Your competence disqualifies you.
How employers fail to support neurodivergent staff, then punish them for the gap they created.
Ombudsmen, regulators, and tribunals reproduce the same barriers they're supposed to remedy. The loop closes.
↻ The cycle restarts. The bias persists.
Also in the series
Education, employment, and insurance fail disabled people using the same structure — the same legal framework, the same implementation gap, the same regulatory inaction. It's not three problems. It's one problem with three addresses.
Full Research
The complete evidence base behind the series. Cross-sector analysis spanning education, employment, and financial services, with 80+ sources including ENIGMA consortium neuroimaging data, SEND tribunal statistics, FCA Consumer Duty reviews, and the Which? super-complaint.
New pieces and updates delivered to your inbox. No spam, no algorithms, unsubscribe anytime.
Powered by Substack
About
Mark Friese MEng MIET
Researcher and writer — Auchterarder, Scotland
Mark is a neurodivergent researcher, writer, and advocate based in Auchterarder. He writes at the intersection of academic research, policy analysis, and lived experience — examining how UK systems create, sustain, and fail to remedy disadvantage for neurodivergent and disabled people.
The Broken by Design series draws on academic research, legal analysis, regulatory complaints, and primary source evidence from navigating the systems it describes. It argues that the outcomes experienced by neurodivergent and disabled people are not failures of individual systems but predictable consequences of design choices — and that design choices can be changed.